Take a look at our
ThinkPads.com HOME PAGE
For those who might want to contribute to the blog, start here: Editors Alley Topic
Then contact Bill with a Private Message
ThinkPads.com HOME PAGE
For those who might want to contribute to the blog, start here: Editors Alley Topic
Then contact Bill with a Private Message
Bios 2.07 vs old bios (1.03 etc)
-
thibouille27
- Junior Member

- Posts: 311
- Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 11:51 am
- Location: Brussels, Belgium
Bios 2.07 vs old bios (1.03 etc)
Id the power consumption problem only related to wake up after standby or does the laptop consumes more power at all time?
If so, would a go back to 1.03 have any specific problem (except the lack of official support for Vista).
What do I have to earn from going back to these old bioses ?
If so, would a go back to 1.03 have any specific problem (except the lack of official support for Vista).
What do I have to earn from going back to these old bioses ?
TP X23 +UBX2 +cdrw
TP X60 +UBX6 +dvdrw slim + floppy + 8cells battery
TP X60 +UBX6 +dvdrw slim + floppy + 8cells battery
Re: Bios 2.07 vs old bios (1.03 etc)
I installed BIOS 2.07 and gave it a thorough test as far as power consumption.thibouille27 wrote:Id the power consumption problem only related to wake up after standby or does the laptop consumes more power at all time?
My experience is that, coupled with all other Windows and ThinkPad updates, the new BIOS is:
(1) somewhat better on power consumption than the previous versions -- with 2.07 wattage drops to 5.49W on idling with screen brightness set to 0 and wireless off.
(2) free from the infamous standby/hibernation resume issue when after waking up the computer would consume 2-3W more power than before. Somehow they have fixed it along the line.
So I would rather stay with 2.07. It seems to be better for all intents and purposes.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Madana
x60s (1704-44U): 1GB, 100GB 5400, WinXP Pro, 8-cell
Madana
x60s (1704-44U): 1GB, 100GB 5400, WinXP Pro, 8-cell
Re: Bios 2.07 vs old bios (1.03 etc)
madana wrote:(1) somewhat better on power consumption than the previous versions -- with 2.07 wattage drops to 5.49W on idling with screen brightness set to 0 and wireless off.
(2) free from the infamous standby/hibernation resume issue when after waking up the computer would consume 2-3W more power than before. Somehow they have fixed it along the line.
Did you test the above with 2.06 by chance?
X61
Re: Bios 2.07 vs old bios (1.03 etc)
Yes, I did. The standby-resume issue was resolved with 2.06+updates as well, but the wattage is slightly better with 2.07 -- say, by ~ 0.05W.sugo wrote: Did you test the above with 2.06 by chance?
Regards,
Madana
x60s (1704-44U): 1GB, 100GB 5400, WinXP Pro, 8-cell
Madana
x60s (1704-44U): 1GB, 100GB 5400, WinXP Pro, 8-cell
Re: Bios 2.07 vs old bios (1.03 etc)
Hey, thanks for the review. I've been sitting on 1.11, waiting for a good BIOS update to come. It will be nice to have the virtualization option and increased memory for graphics.madana wrote: I installed BIOS 2.07 and gave it a thorough test as far as power consumption.
-
thibouille27
- Junior Member

- Posts: 311
- Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 11:51 am
- Location: Brussels, Belgium
There is at least one glitch with 2.07, however, that I have been able to catch so far and which has not been there in the previous BIOS versions.
If I put machine to a standby on either battery or AC with the screen deemed down all the way to "0", then after resume the brightness level is always one notch up at "1", and I have to turn it down manually back to "0".
This is, however, not the case with hibernation, nor with any pre-standby brightness level other than "0".
Harmless but weird. I hope they will fix it in the next BIOS version.
If I put machine to a standby on either battery or AC with the screen deemed down all the way to "0", then after resume the brightness level is always one notch up at "1", and I have to turn it down manually back to "0".
This is, however, not the case with hibernation, nor with any pre-standby brightness level other than "0".
Harmless but weird. I hope they will fix it in the next BIOS version.
Regards,
Madana
x60s (1704-44U): 1GB, 100GB 5400, WinXP Pro, 8-cell
Madana
x60s (1704-44U): 1GB, 100GB 5400, WinXP Pro, 8-cell
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
Thinkpad Helix 2 - Old Bios (1.77) Update (2.16-2020) done ...
by friedrich-eugen » Sun Oct 26, 2025 9:31 am » in ThinkPad/Ideapad Tablets & Convertibles - 0 Replies
- 10802 Views
-
Last post by friedrich-eugen
Sun Oct 26, 2025 9:31 am
-
-
-
I want to buy a Thinkpad after selling my old chums Ham Radio
by p0d » Mon Nov 03, 2025 2:58 pm » in Thinkpad - General HARDWARE/SOFTWARE questions - 1 Replies
- 6787 Views
-
Last post by dcfbf
Mon Nov 03, 2025 6:05 pm
-
-
-
T420 BIOS update fails with "BIOS directory not found" error
by FastCabbage » Mon Apr 20, 2026 3:40 pm » in ThinkPad T400/T410/T420 and T500/T510/T520 Series - 0 Replies
- 178 Views
-
Last post by FastCabbage
Mon Apr 20, 2026 3:40 pm
-
-
-
Should I update my T440p BIOS?
by CicadaCool » Wed Nov 26, 2025 8:11 am » in ThinkPad T430-T495 / T530-T590 Series - 2 Replies
- 9270 Views
-
Last post by ZaZ
Fri Nov 28, 2025 1:51 am
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 81 guests




