Take a look at our
ThinkPads.com HOME PAGE
For those who might want to contribute to the blog, start here: Editors Alley Topic
Then contact Bill with a Private Message

Build quality of T61 vs my older T40.

Performance, hardware, software, general buying and gaming discussion..
Post Reply
Message
Author
vinny77
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 11:11 pm
Location: Bronx, NY
Contact:

Build quality of T61 vs my older T40.

#1 Post by vinny77 » Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:01 pm

I have had a T40 for about a year now and I love it. All that I dont like is the screen, to low of a resolution, but I deal with it fine.

Anyhow, my brother is now in the market for a laptop and wants a thinkpad. H wants the T61, but I am not to sure,

We went to a store near us in manhattan to see them and to be honest the T61 was really big and felt really flimsy. It felt no where near as strong and tough as my T40. though I must say the T60 was pretty close, it was still lacking. I mostly felt the weakness in the palm rests.

I am kinda worried that these new t61's are not as good and he may be better off with another company.

tomh009
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 3021
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Kitchener, ON

#2 Post by tomh009 » Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:16 pm

The difference you felt in the palmrest was due to the fact that in the T40 the palmrest was structural -- it is thick and strong in order to strengthen the T40 case -- while the T61 relies on its internal "roll cage", and the external plastics, like the palmrest, are non-structural "skin" that simply covers the internals.
X220 (4287-2W5, Windows 8 Pro) / X31 (2672-CXU, XP Pro) / X61s (7668-CTO, Windows 8 Pro)

mattbiernat
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1626
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:18 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY

#3 Post by mattbiernat » Mon Aug 06, 2007 5:36 pm

tomh009 wrote:The difference you felt in the palmrest was due to the fact that in the T40 the palmrest was structural -- it is thick and strong in order to strengthen the T40 case -- while the T61 relies on its internal "roll cage", and the external plastics, like the palmrest, are non-structural "skin" that simply covers the internals.
now this makes me wonder... hit T40 with a hammer and hit T61 with a hammer. it you hit T60 in between roll cage, you will potentially damage its internal organs. but on the other side T61's internals could better withstand fall because of this re-enforced cage. ehh.... just my $0.02.

crashnburn
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1728
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 4:26 pm
Location: TX, USA & Bombay, India

#4 Post by crashnburn » Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:36 pm

mattbiernat wrote:
tomh009 wrote:The difference you felt in the palmrest was due to the fact that in the T40 the palmrest was structural -- it is thick and strong in order to strengthen the T40 case -- while the T61 relies on its internal "roll cage", and the external plastics, like the palmrest, are non-structural "skin" that simply covers the internals.
now this makes me wonder... hit T40 with a hammer and hit T61 with a hammer. it you hit T60 in between roll cage, you will potentially damage its internal organs. but on the other side T61's internals could better withstand fall because of this re-enforced cage. ehh.... just my $0.02.
Interesting thought. Can we actually figure out a way to validate it?
T61 8892-02U: 14.1"SXGA+/2.2C2D/4G/XP|Adv Mini Dock|30" Gateway XHD3000 WQXGA via Dual-link DVI
X61T 7767-96U: 12.1"SXGA+/1.6C2D/3G/Vista|Ultrabase
W510 4319-2PU: 15.6"FHD/i7-720QM/4G/Win7Pro64 (for dad)
T43 1875-DLU: 14.1"XGA/1.7PM-740/1G/XP (Old)

AlphaKilo470
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 2762
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 1:42 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Contact:

#5 Post by AlphaKilo470 » Mon Aug 06, 2007 10:22 pm

Yean, anyone have a hammer and a T61?

You'll probably damage any laptop if you hit it with a hammer.
Latitude E7250: i5 5300U 2.3ghz, 12gb RAM, 12" 1080p touch, 256gb SSD, Win 10, Linux Mint 18.2
HP Compaq 6910p: 2GHZ C2D T6400, 4gb RAM, 14.1" WXGA, 500gb WD Blue, Linux Mint 18.2
ThinkPad T60: 2GHZ CD T2500, 2gb RAM, 14.1" XGA, 60gb 7k100, Win 7 Ult

stator
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:41 am

#6 Post by stator » Tue Aug 07, 2007 3:23 pm

I just moved from a T40 that I used for several years to a T61. The T61 is definitely stronger. Pick up the T40 in the corner near the keyboard with the lid open and you will see the difference (this is not really recommended). The T40 flexes too much there.

The reason why I purchased a T61 was that my video went out on the T40 due to the flexing and the BGA mount of the video unit to the motherboard.

A design flaw in the lower case is the major weakness of the T40 series, IMO. It is just not strong enough which stresses the motherboard.

Of course my T40 survived for several years commuting in the saddle bags of my hog, but my T23 has survived four years and is still going strong. HP and Dells will last less than a year with this torture test.

andrewb
Freshman Member
Posts: 96
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 3:01 am
Location: London, UK

#7 Post by andrewb » Tue Aug 07, 2007 4:13 pm

I agree with the observations of the original poster.

My new T60 has palm rests made out of what can only be described as flexi-plastic. A huge difference when compared to my T43 and X41, both of which are rock solid.

Whilst other aspects of the T60 are fine, and, indeed, probably worthy of commendation, the palm rest quality (and that of the keyboard itself) is sadly lacking.

Unless someone can convince me otherwise, I am inclined towards thinking that this reflects cost cutting by Lenovo.

pianowizard
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 8556
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

#8 Post by pianowizard » Tue Aug 07, 2007 4:58 pm

andrewb wrote:My new T60 has palm rests made out of what can only be described as flexi-plastic. A huge difference when compared to my T43 and X41, both of which are rock solid.
Many forum members, including myself, have had opposite experiences. My T60 was very nearly as well built as the 600/600E series, whereas my T43 was one of the most delicate Thinkpads I have ever owned. My X60s was also as solid as my X40.
Dell Latitude 7370 (QHD+, 2.84lb); HP Pavilion x2 12-b096ms (FHD+, 3.14lb); Microsoft Surface 3 (FHD+, 2.00lb);
HP Z440 (Xeon E5-1630 v3); Dell OptiPlex 5040 SFF (Core i5-6600), OptiPlex XE2 (Core i7-4770S)
Acer ET322QK, T272HUL; Crossover 404K; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP

dr_st
Admin
Admin
Posts: 10032
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 6:20 am
Location: Israel

#9 Post by dr_st » Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:04 am

I have a T42 15" and a T60 14". Both are very solid. The T60 flexes less when picked up by the corner with an open lid. This is probably in part to a strengthened case, and in part due to being smaller (better weight distribution). The keyboard quality isn't any lower either.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Thinkpad - General HARDWARE/SOFTWARE questions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests