You're more than welcome to elaborate on the reasons for your choice but are just as welcome to keep them to yourself.
Let the games begin...
In the spirit of true sportsmanship, I'll open up by stating that *my personal choice* is NEVER.
Genuine curiosity on my end: what difference does it make ? There are at least 4 vaccines out at this point (Pfizer, Moderna, Russian, Chinese) and there certainly will be more to come.The reason for the question being "generic" if you will was more along the lines of determining how people feel about getting a C-19 vaccine as opposed to getting the vaccine. Nevertheless, your thoughts are highly appreciated...
I received the smallpox vaccine twice at the age and location where I had absolutely zero choice in the matter.have no problem with vaccinations (I've had MMR and tetanus at the least -- I was too young for the smallpox vaccine)

The Chinese vaccine has no publicly available data regarding its phase 3 testing results. Not sure about the Russian one though, though it's probably on the same boat.ajkula66 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 10:40 pmGenuine curiosity on my end: what difference does it make ? There are at least 4 vaccines out at this point (Pfizer, Moderna, Russian, Chinese) and there certainly will be more to come.The reason for the question being "generic" if you will was more along the lines of determining how people feel about getting a C-19 vaccine as opposed to getting the vaccine. Nevertheless, your thoughts are highly appreciated...![]()
Well explained as usual...
I always had an uneasy gut feeling about Mr. Gates and his non-MS-related activities worldwide have only made it stronger...
I like to see the data first. That's all. At least then I can pretend that I know what I'm doing
For two decades they have been handing out tax-payer funded flu vaccines. People line up in parking lots to reach into somebody else's pocket for a flu shot. These flu shots have been proven to be completely useless at best; in some instances actually harmful. The flu season comes and goes, just as it did in the 1960s, '70s. A portion of the population gets the flu and recovers from it without any help from medical science and the products of pharma corporations. There are products in the stores which we may purchase with our own money, but those are only for the symptoms (stuffy nose, so you can sleep).A spoonful of honey in a barrel of tar.
Better yet, TB not even on the list of the vaccines that kids are expected to receive in the U.S. I was floored when I found this out 20 years ago...
If you want to open that can of worms, it's fair to say that most of Big Pharma - along with select other industries - would've ceased to exist decades ago...If pFizer corporation could be held responsible for its actions, wouldn't it be out of existence by now ?
I was not comparing the two diseases.
I was mainly responding to 789 when I was quoting the number of deaths from each disease and contrasting the vast differences in mortality. My first sentence (about the US not regularly vaccinating against TB) was more for your benefit. Sorry if I wasn't clear. Yes, drug-resistant TB appears to be gaining a foothold. Would you prefer that kids be inoculated against TB (using the current drugs) rather than get the MMR shot?
Yes.
The entire study here:It is possible that people from TB endemic countries like India despite vast population and growing numbers of COVID19 infection, have acquired some protections from severity and deaths from COVID-19 in comparison to TB non-endemic countries (like Europe and USA). Although it appears the immunity may not able to stop COVID 19 infections, but is likely to diminish its impact on severity and mortality.
In 2020 7,000 million people, 99% of the population of the planet, managed on their own to resist the Wuhan flu ---without any help from government employees, from medical science, from corporations of high morality and virtue, like pFizer of Lipitor fame.Microsoft and Windows are the best things that could ever happen to a computer
Yet, now I should inject something made by these corporate citizens who should have been dispossessed and put out of existence years ago.it's fair to say that most of Big Pharma would've ceased to exist
That's not true. You have no idea how many people were actually exposed to the virus.
So far, that hasn't happened with this virus.
This isn't a flu.
Again, COVID-19 is not a flu and significant numbers of older people actually have died of it. The main concern has always been that the health care system will get overwhelmed with cases. Clearly, COVID-19 is not going to kill off a substantial portion of the population.
Not true. I live in British Columbia and infective cases of TB involve mandatory isolation.
Well, this is kind of ridiculous. I don't know what they do in the US, but in Canada, notification of previous sexual partners is mandatory.789 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 27, 2020 8:36 pmIs there record of how many people are infected with syphilis each year ? shouldn't we mandate wearing chastity belts or large adult diapers on the outside ? should we not segregate people from each other until it is eradicated ? should we not force syphilis carriers to disclose their movements and contacts in the previous six months ?
I would argue that the reason that it hasn't happened this time around is because the "powers that be" didn't allow such a turn of events. But that horse is out of the barn...
I took the numbers from here:That's not true. You have no idea how many people were actually exposed to the virus.
John Rockefeller and Standard Oil Corporation were the best things that ever happened to medical science
Sure. But again, the point is that obviously only a fraction of that population has been exposed to the virus.789 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 29, 2020 9:46 amI took the numbers from here:That's not true. You have no idea how many people were actually exposed to the virus.
https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/
Is the population not 7,800 million ?
So much for medical science and their vaccines. They could have just given him a tall glass of soldy water.They gave a vaccine shot to a 75 year old man, two hours later he died anyway.
Where did you source the quote, "They gave a vaccine shot to a 75 year old man...? It doesn't appear anywhere in the article you referenced. How do you know they gave the man a "flu shot" and not the COVID vaccine and then the authorities registered his death as due to COVID? The only thing that you have stated in your post that appears to be true is that the man had a history of heart problems. Every other "fact" is just not supported by the evidence you've provided.789 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 31, 2020 9:27 amSo much for medical science and their vaccines. They could have just given him a tall glass of soldy water.They gave a vaccine shot to a 75 year old man, two hours later he died anyway.
https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/isr ... oal-653461
The man obviously had a heart problem, so the experts gave him a flu shot, then marked him down as another covid death.
The Jerusalem Post - Israel News wrote:"A 75-year-old man from Beit She’an died of a heart attack about two hours after being vaccinated against the novel coronavirus on Monday morning, the Health Ministry reported."
Nothing to see here move on.The Jerusalem Post wrote:The initial findings do not show a link between the man’s death and his vaccination, Levy said.

Was the man 75 years old ?

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 39 guests